Editorial standards and sourcing

This page exists so any claim on this site can be checked. It covers how we verify the maths, where our claims about game theory and solvers come from, who funds the site, and what happens when we get something wrong.

Show the arithmetic

Strategy claims on this site are meant to be checkable, not taken on trust. Where a lesson turns on a number, we show the calculation that produces it: the pot-odds fraction, the expected-value line with each branch priced, the combination count behind a range. If you cannot reproduce our number from the working shown, that is a bug in the article and we want to hear about it.

Sourcing

Claims about game theory, Nash equilibrium, counterfactual regret minimisation and poker AI cite the primary research directly, with the paper named and linked at the foot of the article. We do not write "studies show" or "experts say" without naming the study or the expert. Where a real source does not exist for a claim, we cut the claim rather than soften it into a vague generality.

What this site is not

How we are funded

Corrections

We correct errors in place and note the change. Material corrections, meaning anything that alters a calculation or a factual claim, are marked with an updated date on the article. Email [email protected] if you find one, and include the URL and what is wrong.

Republishing and citation

You may quote this site, including in AI-generated answers, with attribution to PokerCraft Lab and a link to the source URL. Our machine-readable content map lives at /llms.txt.

Last reviewed 27 July 2026.